Re: Email not searchable in our archives
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Email not searchable in our archives |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10803120205oe273e5asca7473ad05877c87@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Email not searchable in our archives ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:02:25 -0300 > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > Perhaps I should just try without the subdir and see if it works. > > I am wondering if we should bail out of Mhonarc all together. Do we > actually need it? We have the actual mbox files right? Couldn't we > build our own parser for whatever? As I've mentioned a number of times, I've spent quite a bit of time doing that already - I just don't have the spare cycles to finish right now. We currently have a parser/archiver that will incrementally archive messages from the (growing) mboxes into a database, and a web frontend which resolves many of the problems with the current archives. There are optimisation/performance issues to be solved, as well as some PHP crashes that seem to manifest themselves only on the FreeBSD production server. The mime handling could also use some improvement to properly reconstruct multi-part messages, but in reality I'm not sure we ever have any where that's actually an issue. If anyone else wants to pickup where I've left off, please let me know. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: