Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10802130658w41763bcdud128f3636ab0cce1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data
Type' list
Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list |
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Feb 13, 2008 2:56 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > That's something I already heard at Solutions Linux 2008. I talked with > someone who has this kind of issues. This guy has lots of tables, so his > type combo box is really huge, and becomes actually unusable. > > Table types are perfectly valid and we need to have them, but the combo > box becomes (is already?) unusable. We probably should think about > designing if differently : for example a text box and a button. The text > box allows someone to quickly, but manually, put a type, and the button > allows to open a new window with a listbox containing all types and two > checkboxes, one to add/remove array types, another one to add/remove > table types. OK, so I'm thinking for now then we should just remove table types altogether - as Peter reports, we only show the array types anyway, so I guess few people actually want to use them given that we've had no prior complaints. We can add a TODO to redesign things later. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Oracle-compatible database company
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: