Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot

Tom,<br />    I just took the patch, but it seems to be in binary format. Can you send me the patch to me?<br /><br
/>Thanks,<br/>Gokul.<br /><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Tom Lane <span
dir="ltr"><<ahref="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquote
class="gmail_quote"style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left:
1ex;"><divclass="im">Josh Berkus <<a href="mailto:josh@agliodbs.com">josh@agliodbs.com</a>> writes:<br
/></div><divclass="im">> Tom,<br /> >> Is anyone interested enough to try it if I code it?<br /><br /> > If
you'repatient for results, sure.  I seem to be doing a customer<br /> > migration or upgrade every week now, so it
wouldn'ttake me long to have<br /> > a test subject with a fairly complex database.<br /><br /></div>Here's a draft
patchthat does ordering using two lists, as I proposed.<br /> Please test to see if it's any faster or slower than the
originallogic.<br /><br /> Note: since this changes struct TocEntry, be sure to recompile all files<br /> in
src/bin/pg_dump/after patching.<br /><br />                        regards, tom lane<br /><br /><br /><br /> --<br />
Sentvia pgsql-hackers mailing list (<a href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br
/>To make changes to your subscription:<br /><a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers"
target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers</a><br/><br /></blockquote></div><br />