Re: WAL logging of hash indexes
От | Gokulakannan Somasundaram |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL logging of hash indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9362e74e0801160038j4bbec4c8s24ae84a672f76b54@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL logging of hash indexes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix<br /> hash's performanceproblems. If there is no real-world scenario for<br />using it ... which there really isn't ... then adding WALsupport<br />still leaves you with no real-world scenario for using it.<br /><br />This is not to suggest that I wouldn'tlike to see all of that fixed; <br />I would. But let's concentrate on the showstoppers first, rather than<br />expendingeffort that might ultimately be a waste.<br /><br /><br /></blockquote></div>I agree on that. I think workingon Hash clusters would add more use-cases than working on hash-indexes. <br /><br />Thanks,<br />Gokul. <br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: