Re: Upgrading an extension's extnamespace from user-specified to a defined schema breaks dump/restore
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading an extension's extnamespace from user-specified to a defined schema breaks dump/restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 935496.1715207399@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrading an extension's extnamespace from user-specified to a defined schema breaks dump/restore ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upgrading an extension's extnamespace from user-specified to a defined schema breaks dump/restore
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 8:15 PM David G. Johnston < > david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: >> tl/dr - alter extension ... set schema ... needs to update >> pg_extension.extnamespace if the named schema matches the current value in >> the control file. Otherwise, extension authors can and have introduced a >> dump/restore failure mode that the DBA can only fix via direct catalog >> manipulation. > Tom's recent bug regarding alter extension reminded me that no has > expressed an opinion on this one. A quick test says that ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA *does* update pg_extension.extnamespace to the new schema. Re-reading your original message, I'm of the opinion that pg_cron's control files are probably broken. If they are changing from relocatable to not, then they need to specify that property in a version-specific control file not the main one. Maybe there's something else that needs to happen in our code, but updating extnamespace doesn't seem to be it. Also, I do see code that purports to cope with a version-related update of the relocatable flag --- whether we test that, I'm not sure, but there's not something obviously missing. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: