Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9351D2C1-D5C1-49F2-A862-A2654A65E85B@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On October 8, 2018 8:03:56 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >> Where is the jit=on coming from? Config from before it was turned >off? > >A look in guc.c shows that jit defaults to "on" whether or not JIT is >enabled at compile time. I thought Pavel was talking about 11 somehow... > This seems, at best, rather user-unfriendly. >And it's not like our conventions for other compile-option-affected >GUCs, eg the SSL ones. That was intentional, even though it perhaps should be better documented. That allows a distro to build and distribute pgwithout llvm enabled, but then have the JIT package with all the dependencies separately. The pg yum packages do so. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: