Re: PDF files: to store in database or not
От | David Wall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PDF files: to store in database or not |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 93456f55-20ea-599c-9f82-d4cddbb53a9d@computer.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PDF files: to store in database or not (Eric Schwarzenbach <subscriber@blackbrook.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PDF files: to store in database or not
Re: PDF files: to store in database or not Re: PDF files: to store in database or not |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/6/16 11:12 AM, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote: > On 12/06/2016 01:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> On 12/06/2016 10:30 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: >> >>> My thinking is to not store these documents in the database, but >>> to store >>> them in subdirectories outside the database. >>> >>> Your thoughts? >> >> Due to the widely variable size of a PDF document, I would say no. I >> would store the metadata and file location. >> >> > Can you elaborate on this? Why is the variable size an issue? Are you > assuming the files go into the same table as the rest of the data? > (They certainly don't have to, and I would assume that not to be the > smartest design.) The advantages of storing in the database is that a DB backup will have everything, instead of a DB backup and a file system backup. Using a BLOB, you can certainly keep track of variable length PDFs. Also, if in the database, it can be part of a transaction so you will not have any issues keeping the DB and filesystem in sync. David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: