Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9340.1171897052@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS
Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 13:12 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: >> I don't understand -- what problem you got with "NO OPERATION"? It >> seemed a sound idea to me. > It seems nonorthogonal. What if only some of the tables you mentioned did not > exist? Do you get "SOME OPERATION"? I'd say you get DROP TABLE as long as at least one table was dropped. > There are also other cases where commands don't have an effect but we don't > explicitly point that out. The precedent that I'm thinking about is that the command tag for COMMIT varies depending on what it actually did. regression=# begin; BEGIN regression=# select 1/0; ERROR: division by zero regression=# commit; ROLLBACK regression=# regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: