Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 931747.1721687375@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 1:55 PM David Christensen <david@pgguru.net> wrote: >> I see that there'd been some chatter but not a lot of discussion about >> a GROUP BY ALL feature/functionality. There certainly is utility in >> such a construct IMHO. > I strongly dislike adding this feature. I'd only consider supporting it if > it was part of the SQL standard. Yeah ... my recollection is that we already rejected this idea. If you want to re-litigate that, "throwing this out there" is not a sufficient argument. (Personally, I'd wonder exactly what ALL is quantified over: the whole output of the FROM clause, or only columns mentioned in the SELECT tlist, or what? And why that choice rather than another?) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: