Re: Conflicting declarations for b64_encode etc. on Solaris 11.4 Beta
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Conflicting declarations for b64_encode etc. on Solaris 11.4 Beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9303.1519861047@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Conflicting declarations for b64_encode etc. on Solaris 11.4 Beta (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Conflicting declarations for b64_encode etc. on Solaris 11.4 Beta
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > Attached is an updated patch which does a bit more consistency work. I > have renamed the base64 functions with pg_base64_ as prefix in encode.c, > to avoid any conflicts in encode.c. pgp-armor.c also gets the same > treatment. There is no real point in renaming the other functions is > not necessary, and hex_encode/hex_decode are publicly available, so > renaming them would cause breakage for any callers of them in plugins. Pushed. > It is a bit sad that both pgcrypto and encode.c hold copies of base64 > functions. And on top of that, there's src/common/base64.c with again almost the same functionality. But refactoring to fix that would be a bit invasive and not something to back-patch. I think what you did here is appropriate as a minimal portability fix. Maybe later somebody will look into removing the duplication, as a HEAD-only improvement. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: