Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
От | Scott Lamb |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 92F4B642-6F75-11D7-84B1-000393D581B8@slamb.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday, Apr 15, 2003, at 13:58 US/Central, Josh Berkus wrote: >> - Requiring submitters to understand CVS. But honestly, I'm not sure >> about the quality of any tech document written by someone who doesn't. > > One of the things that we could desperately use for TechDocs, for > example, is > an article like "Creating An OpenOffice.org Mail Merge document from a > PostgreSQL database." In what way does the author of such a document > need a > knowledge of CVS? Okay, I see your point and Justin's. My attitude comes from thinking that anyone who uses PostgreSQL is going to do so as part of a development project. If that were true, I think that my statement would follow, since I believe that anyone who develops well does so using version control. But maybe it's not true that all PostgreSQL users are developers. A mail merge is a good example of something you can do with PostgreSQL without being a developer. Scott
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: