Re: Incorrect estimates on columns
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrect estimates on columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9262.1192646974@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Incorrect estimates on columns (Chris Kratz <chris.kratz@vistashare.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrect estimates on columns
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Chris Kratz <chris.kratz@vistashare.com> writes: > I'm struggling to get postgres to run a particular query quickly. The key problem seems to be the join size misestimate here: > -> Hash Join (cost=45.92..1251.07 rows=21 width=8) (actual time=0.948..10.439 rows=1199 loops=1) > Hash Cond: (par.activity = a.activityid) > -> Bitmap Heap Scan on rpt_agencyquestioncache_171_0 par (cost=21.92..1222.19 rows=1247 width=8)(actual time=0.415..3.081 rows=1199 loops=1) > -> Hash (cost=19.21..19.21 rows=383 width=4) (actual time=0.513..0.513 rows=383 loops=1) Evidently it's not realizing that every row of par will have a join partner, but why not? I suppose a.activityid is unique, and in most cases that I've seen the code seems to get that case right. Would you show us the pg_stats rows for par.activity and a.activityid? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: