Re: Why are we waiting?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why are we waiting? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9205.1202162782@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why are we waiting? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why are we waiting?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I'm thinking of adding an extra parameter onto every call to > LockBuffer() and LWLockAcquire() to explain the reason for the lock > request. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see what this would buy us, except for being able to track which call site resulted in a wait; which can already be measured with dtrace, no? I'm hesitant to decorate such widely-used functions with extra tracing information. You'd be breaking every third-party module and pending patch that uses either function, and imposing some performance penalty (probably not much, but it's hard to be sure) into the indefinite future, for a performance measurement need that might be fleeting. Basically I'd rather try to attack the problem with dtrace ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: