Re: Do table-level CHECK constraints affect the query optimizer?
| От | Ron |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Do table-level CHECK constraints affect the query optimizer? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 92045cad-cede-0e90-8d22-62c847f3104e@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Do table-level CHECK constraints affect the query optimizer? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Do table-level CHECK constraints affect the query optimizer?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 6/29/21 12:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes: >> On 6/29/21 11:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> If there's a significant difference in relallvisible fractions, that >>> would point to something different in your VACUUM housekeeping on >>> the two systems. >> Prod is brand new. Loaded on Saturday; we saw this problem on Sunday during >> pre-acceptance. Thus, while running ANALYZE was top of the list of Things >> To Do, running VACUUM was low. >> Is that a mistaken belief? > ANALYZE won't update relallvisible AFAIR, while VACUUM will. > So if you are depending on lots of IOS, you need a round of > vacuuming. What's an IOS? -- Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: