Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9177.1304627235@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7 (Brian Connolly <bconn@labkey.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Brian Connolly <bconn@labkey.com> writes: > Any help that you can provide would be greatly appreciated. I'd suggest trying to get rid of the weird little subselects, like this one: > ... SELECT * FROM assayresult."c69d129_particle_size_result_fields" > WHERE (((SELECT Container FROM exp.Data WHERE RowId = DataId) IN > ('d938da12-1b43-102d-a8a2-78911b79dd1c'))) ... If you turned that into a regular join between c69d129_particle_size_result_fields and Data, the planner probably wouldn't be nearly as confused about how many rows would result. It's the way-off rowcount estimate for this construct that's causing most of the problem, AFAICS: -> Seq Scan on c69d129_particle_size_result_fields (cost=0.00..229742.02 rows=348width=59) (actual time=0.018..572.402 rows=69654 loops=1) Filter: (((SubPlan 3))::text = 'd938da12-1b43-102d-a8a2-78911b79dd1c'::text) SubPlan 3 -> Index Scan using pk_data on data (cost=0.00..3.27 rows=1 width=37) (actualtime=0.004..0.005 rows=1 loops=69654) Index Cond: (rowid = $2) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: