Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I spent some time studying this patch this morning. As far as I can
> see, 0001 is a relatively faithful implementation of the design Tom
> proposed back in early 2019. I think it would be nice to either get
> this committed or else decide that we don't want it and what we're
> going to try to do instead,
Yeah, it's on my to-do list for this CF, but I expect it's going to
take some concentrated study and other things keep intruding :-(.
All of your comments/questions seem reasonable; thanks for taking
a look.
regards, tom lane