Re: COPY enhancements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY enhancements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9109.1254925748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY enhancements (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY enhancements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Emmanuel Cecchet wrote: >> If you prefer to postpone the auto-partitioning to the next commit >> fest, I can strip it from the current patch and re-submit it for the >> next fest (but it's just 2 isolated methods really easy to review). > I certainly think this should be separated out. In general it is not a > good idea to roll distinct features together. It complicates both the > reviewing process and the discussion. I think though that Greg was suggesting that we need some more thought about the overall road map. Agglomerating "independent" features onto COPY one at a time is going to lead to a mess, unless they fit into an overall design plan. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: