Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question
От | Trevor Talbot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 90bce5730708160901t5e0519cbt60b5769ab9b510af@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/16/07, Rainer Bauer <usenet@munnin.com> wrote: > My point is that whatever search criterias are involved and how many items are found eBay always returns the *accurate*number of items found. > > Before this drifts off: > * I do know *why* count(*) is slow using Postgres. > * I *think* that count(*) is fast on eBay because count is cheaper using Oracle (which eBay does: <http://www.sun.com/customers/index.xml?c=ebay.xml>). > * I realize that pagination for multi-million tuple results does not make sense. You got me curious, so I went hunting for more hints on what eBay actually does, and found these slides from a presentation given by two eBay engineers last year: http://www.addsimplicity.com/downloads/eBaySDForum2006-11-29.pdf It's, er, a whole different ballgame there. Database behavior is barely involved in their searching; they do joins and RI across database clusters within the _application_. I knew eBay was big, but wow...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: