Re: postgresql vs mysql
От | Richard Broersma Jr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql vs mysql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 909899.75768.qm@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql vs mysql ("Erick Papadakis" <erick.papa@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Does PostgreSQL suffer from this oddity as well? This distinction > between an empty string and a NULL? Could you also please give me an > example of where this would be useful from a business logic > standpoint? Why should a NULL be different from an empty string, > what's the big mysterious difference? Nulls are also useful for data that is imported where there is not always a way to determine certain field values for a record. Now suppose in a query you want to return all record that meet your criteria as well as any that might meet your criteria depending if the null value was actually known. Select * from table Where ((field1,field2,field3) = ('farmer','baker','shoemaker')) is unknown; Now you can get all records that may meet your criteria. Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: