Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
От | Yang Zhang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9066fa251002221130m6b4b97bby1cc6bbfd00af6353@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Yang Zhang escribió: >> I have the exact same table of data in both MySQL and Postgresql. In Postgresql: > > I just noticed two things: > > [snip lots of stuff] > > 1. > >> ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=50410166 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 > > You're doing a comparison to MyISAM. We've actually been using innodb as well; it exhibits similar execution times to MyISAM. > > > 2. > >> select * from metarelcloud_transactionlog order by transactionid; > > You're reading the whole table. > > This is unlikely to fly very far. I suggest you try some query that's > actually going to be used in the real world. This isn't some microbenchmark. This is part of our actual analytical application. We're running large-scale graph partitioning algorithms. -- Yang Zhang http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: