Re: Pg_dumpall
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 903C7F7F-C143-47A2-8CF3-0EC48E2390B2@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Pg_dumpall (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pg_dumpall
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hi, > On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/backup-dump.html > Description: > > "The basic usage of this command is: > > pg_dumpall > outfile > The resulting dump can be restored with psql: > > psql -f infile postgres > (Actually, you can specify any existing database name to..." > > Should this not read : > psql-f outfile postgres Technically it is correct: you’re dumping data to an output file, and reading the data in from an input file. The documentation also makes reference to what the “outfile” and “infile” represent. That being said, I can see how it can be confusing particularly if you are reading through the documentation quickly. Perhaps a name like “dumpfile” would be more clear? Jonathan
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: