Re: TIMESTAMP WITH( OUT)? TIME ZONE indexing/type choice...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TIMESTAMP WITH( OUT)? TIME ZONE indexing/type choice... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9000.1045636466@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TIMESTAMP WITH( OUT)? TIME ZONE indexing/type choice... (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: TIMESTAMP WITH( OUT)? TIME ZONE indexing/type choice...
Re: TIMESTAMP WITH( OUT)? TIME ZONE indexing/type choice... |
Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > I just don't see what use a timestamp that doesn't represent a particular time > would ever be. It seems to serve only as a gotcha for unwary programmers who > take the default. I have a problem with that too :-( ... timestamptz seems much the more generally useful type. But the SQL spec is pretty definite that "timestamp" means "timestamp without time zone". Is anybody interested in the idea of a GUC parameter to choose whether "timestamp" means "timestamp with time zone" (useful) or "timestamp without time zone" (anally spec-compliant)? Or would that just muddy the waters even more than they are already? We already changed the meaning once... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: