Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8edc6c04-5ea7-4ec9-028b-8a1f0665cfa8@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/4/17 9:08 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes, it's taking a time to update logic and measurement but it's >>> coming along. Also I'm working on changing deadlock detection. Will >>> post new patch and measurement result. >> >> I think that we should push this patch out to v11. I think there are >> too many issues here to address in the limited time we have remaining >> this cycle, and I believe that if we try to get them all solved in the >> next few weeks we're likely to end up getting backed into some choices >> by time pressure that we may later regret bitterly. Since I created >> the deadlock issues that this patch is facing, I'm willing to try to >> help solve them, but I think it's going to require considerable and >> delicate surgery, and I don't think doing that under time pressure is >> a good idea. >> >> From a fairness point of view, a patch that's not in reviewable shape >> on March 1st should really be pushed out, and we're several days past >> that. >> > > Agreed. There are surely some rooms to discuss about the design yet, > and it will take long time. it's good to push this out to CF2017-07. > Thank you for the comment. I have marked this patch "Returned with Feedback." Of course you are welcome to submit this patch to the 2017-07 CF, or whenever you feel it is ready. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: