Re: Query on User account password change details
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query on User account password change details |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8ed70776-3c35-d688-4820-4c73cbdb767a@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query on User account password change details (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 5/7/21 9:10 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 08:55:15AM -0500, Ron wrote: >> On 5/7/21 7:30 AM, Scott Ribe wrote: >>>> On May 6, 2021, at 11:40 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Comments like this are indicative of someone who's never been through an external audit. >>> While maybe true, the point stands that even the original source of the requirement has admitted it's a bad idea, andstandards bodies are dropping it. So, unlike many other things we might consider pointless, with this one, you have thekind of defense that might work in an audit. >> The problem is that Postgresql allows Really Short Passwords without >> uttering a peep, and that's not defensible to an auditor. >> >> psql (12.5 (Ubuntu 12.5-1.pgdg18.04+1)) >> Type "help" for help. >> >> postgres=# create role foo password 'a'; >> CREATE ROLE >> postgres=# > Have you considered passwordcheck? > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/passwordcheck.html This might satisfy my own audit requirements! -- Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: