Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8e0779af847f1c557c1ce0e96d5eec01ea71b2ef.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Chris Travers wrote: > Also MySQL has a query cache that allows the results of very common queries to be much faster. I have used that feature, and it has bitten me: https://stackoverflow.com/q/44244482/6464308 I guess only some rather pathological workloads really benefit from that. > For updates, MySQL avoids a lot of index write overhead. PostgreSQL has more overhead per update. That is what I meant when I said that PostgreSQL is less suitable for a key-value store. There is HOT update which can mitigate the problem if the updated columns are not indexed. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: