Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

On 3/23/21 10:56 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:51:32AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
>> On 3/22/21 7:18 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
>> > On 3/22/21 5:36 PM, Zhihong Yu wrote:
>> > >     Hi,
>> > > 
>> > > w.r.t. pg_upgrade_improvements.v2.diff.
>> > > 
>> > > +       blobBatchCount = 0;
>> > > +       blobInXact = false;
>> > > 
>> > > The count and bool flag are always reset in tandem. It seems
>> > > variable blobInXact is not needed.
>> > 
>> > You are right. I will fix that.
>> 
>> New patch v3 attached.
> 
> Would it be better to allow pg_upgrade to pass arbitrary arguments to
> pg_restore, instead of just these specific ones?
> 

That would mean arbitrary parameters to pg_dump as well as pg_restore. 
But yes, that would probably be better in the long run.

Any suggestion as to how that would actually look like? Unfortunately 
pg_restore has -[dDoOr] already used, so it doesn't look like there will 
be any naturally intelligible short options for that.


Regards, Jan

-- 
Jan Wieck
Principle Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services