Re: New Object Access Type hooks

On 3/22/22 14:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> OK, I have pushed that.
> It seems like you could remove the NO_INSTALLCHECK restriction
> too.  You already removed the comment defending it, and it
> seems to work fine as an installcheck now if I remove that
> locally.
>
> Other nitpicks:
>
> * the IsParallelWorker test could use a comment
>
> * I notice a typo "permisisons" in test_oat_hooks.sql
>
>             



Fixed


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com