Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8cc0cdc8-baa5-f1ba-24fa-950b24d05667@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/14/2018 01:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: >> I have no doubt that some MUA around would forget to do the conversion. > FWIW, one reason that I invariably use patch(1) to apply submitted patches > is that it will take care of stripping any CRs that may have snuck in. > So I'm not particularly fussed about the problem. I also use patch(1), although probably mainly out of laziness in not changing habits going back to the CVS days ;-) You obviously commit far more patches that I do, but I don't normally see patch complaining about CRs, which is why I raised the issue. > > I'm not excited about encouraging people to use application/octet-stream > rather than text/something for submitted patches. If you use text then > the patch can easily be examined in the web archives; with > application/octet-stream the patch has to be downloaded, adding a lot of > manual overhead. (At least, that's true with my preferred web browser, > maybe it's different for other people?) > > You might have a point. Compressed patched can be particularly annoying. Most other things my browser will download and pop unto geany for me. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: