Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
От | Tatsuro Yamada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8c17a76f-bd60-dcc0-dca7-6a438f57f23d@nttcom.co.jp_1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit-san, On 2021/01/25 18:19, Amit Langote wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:24 AM Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 6:51 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Here's v5. >> >> v5 patches apply to master. >> Suggested If/then optimization is implemented. >> Suggested case merging is implemented. >> Passes make check and make check-world yet again. >> Just to confirm, we don't free the RI_CompareHashEntry because it points to an entry in a hash table which is TopMemoryContextaka lifetime of the session, correct? > > Right. > >> Anybody else want to look this patch over before I mark it Ready For Committer? > > Would be nice to have others look it over. Thanks. Thanks for creating the patch! I tried to review the patch. Here is my comment. * According to this thread [1], it might be better to replace elog() with ereport() in the patch. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/92d6f545-5102-65d8-3c87-489f71ea0a37%40enterprisedb.com Thanks, Tatsuro Yamada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: