Re: ago(interval) → timestamptz
| От | Laurenz Albe | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ago(interval) → timestamptz | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8bf621c358b84f62e2f51f0ab2fb0758da722e49.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | ago(interval) → timestamptz (Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: ago(interval) → timestamptz
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Mon, 2025-11-03 at 22:36 +0100, Florents Tselai wrote:
> I realize this will get some "you can easily implement this yourself” pushback,
> But I keep seeing and writing a lot of WHERE ts > now() - interval '1 day' expressions.
You can easily implement this yourself...
Also, there already is something similar in the shape of 'yesterday'::timestamptz.
Moreover, a good percentage of the users would instead need ago(interval) -> timestamp.
So I'd say that the added value is marginal, and I personally find
   current_timestamp - INTERVAL '1' DAY
more readable and more SQL standard compliant than
   ago('1 day')
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: