Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8bbaad05-414c-a525-1ee5-665817d4e26e@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL (Paul Hughes <paul@vivation.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/10/2017 12:46 PM, Paul Hughes wrote: > Adrian Klaver Wrote: > >>>Many on this list(myself included) will want to know how you came to that conclusion and I am speaking as someone whouses Python, Django and Postgres. > > I came to that conclusion when I saw a list of the top 15 websites > (based on traffic). On that list, *all* of the sites that used > PostgreSQL as their primary data store, also used Python as their > primary back-end language. Those three sites are/were Yahoo, Instagram > and Uber. 3 out of 3 is a pretty high statistical correlation when What list was that? I ask because: 1) Uber Why Uber Engineering Switched from Postgres to MySQL https://eng.uber.com/mysql-migration/ 2)Yahoo AFAIK Yahoo uses just the Postgresql SQL parser over their own database. Also Yahoo makes extensive use of JavaScript and other technologies beside Python. 3) Instagram Probably still Python/Postgres based though now they are part of Facebook it will be interesting to see if that changes. > you're only talking about a sample of 15. Given that, my saying, "I > noticed that most of the largest web platforms that use PostgreSQL as > their primary database, also use Python as their primary back-end > language.", was a fair observation. An observation is just that (one > blind man feeling an elephant). Saying "I noticed that" is a *very* > different thing than making an assertion. > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: