Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments withpg_receivexlog
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments withpg_receivexlog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8b028df1-8b7a-9fb3-e259-6eff89aa0a79@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/23/17 8:52 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > OK, I forgot a bit about this past discussion. So let's say that we > have a command, why not also allow users to use at will a marker %f to > indicate the file name just completed? One use case here is to scan > the file for the oldest and/or newest timestamps of the segment just > finished to do some retention policy with something else in charge of > the cleanup. Why not provide % replacements that contain that info? pg_receivexlog has a much better shot at doing that correctly than some random user tool... (%f could certainly be useful for other things) -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: