Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
От | Alexander Lakhin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8aed364e-f572-4561-b4fc-ff149067b670@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
24.01.2024 20:46, Robert Haas wrote: > This is weird. There's a little more detail in the log file, > regress_log_002_blocks, e.g. from the first failure you linked: > > [11:18:20.683](96.787s) # before insert, summarized TLI 1 through 0/14E09D0 > [11:18:21.188](0.505s) # after insert, summarized TLI 1 through 0/14E0D08 > [11:18:21.326](0.138s) # examining summary for TLI 1 from 0/14E0D08 to 0/155BAF0 > # 1 > ... > [11:18:21.349](0.000s) # got: 'pg_walsummary: error: could > not open file "/home/nm/farm/gcc64/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_walsummary/tmp_check/t_002_blocks_node1_data/pgdata/pg_wal/summaries/0000000100000000014E0D0800000000155BAF0 > # 1.summary": No such file or directory' > > The "examining summary" line is generated based on the output of > pg_available_wal_summaries(). The way that works is that the server > calls readdir(), disassembles the filename into a TLI and two LSNs, > and returns the result. I'm discouraged by "\n1" in the file name and in the "examining summary..." message. regress_log_002_blocks from the following successful test run on the same sungazer node contains: [15:21:58.924](0.106s) # examining summary for TLI 1 from 0/155BAE0 to 0/155E750 [15:21:58.925](0.001s) ok 1 - WAL summary file exists Best regards, Alexander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: