Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Ledford
Тема Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id 8adf46ea1002030755w28703a2fo3a4330c49e18eed9@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Bad idea: once set, it'll never get unset, thus leaving installations
> with a weakened security posture even after they've installed fixed
> versions of openssl.
>
>                        regards, tom lane

One might argue that the current method is already weakened as it is
measured by the amount of data sent instead of of a length of time. A
session could live a long time under the 512MB threshold depending on
the queries that are being performed.

Michael


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Assorted cleanups in preparation for using a map file to support
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: rbtree test data