Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
От | Daniel van Ham Colchete |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8a0c7af10612101702i49b5a533v4a2300d90d9dae6b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations ("Daniel van Ham Colchete" <daniel.colchete@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Gene, at my postgresql.conf, the only non-comented lines are: fsync = off lc_messages = 'C' lc_monetary = 'C' lc_numeric = 'C' lc_time = 'C' max_connections = 100 shared_buffers = 5000 temp_buffers = 1000 work_mem = 4096 The only two values I changed are shared_buffers and work_mem. *** BUT *** I'm using Gentoo Linux, so all my libraries (including glibc that is very important to PostgreSQL), and all my softwares are compiled with good CFLAG options to my processor ("-O2 march=athlon-xp (...)"). My Linux is not an Intel-AMD binary compatible turtle like Fedora/RedHat/SUSE/... It's really important to have your GLIBC compiled for your processor. It is essencial for performance. I can't imagine anyone buying a $1k-dollar quad-core XEON and using an i585 compatible distro that doesn't even know what the fudge is SSE/SSE2/vectorized instructions. Best regards, Daniel Colchete On 12/10/06, Gene <genekhart@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a similar type application, I'm partitioning using constraint > exclusion so queries only have to look at a few tables. I've found that > there is some overhead to using partitioning so you should test to see how > many partitions you want to create. Could I check out you postgresql.conf > parameters to compare? thanks > > > Gene Hart
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: