Re: Sourceforge
От | Jason Petersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sourceforge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8FAF1235-420F-44E4-B1C1-B7FFF6473021@citusdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sourceforge ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sourceforge
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> On May 28, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > We don't have legal ability to restrict them period. We are BSD licensed. The best we can do is put up a PSA. Today a coworker mused whether we could issue a C&D for misuse of trademark if it comes to that. Maybe? > That said, SF doesn't have the traffic to harm us. I am not worried about it. We aren't a web browser or something "users"would download (like Gimp). We came to the same conclusion at lunch today. I wondered aloud whether Oracle would ever extend their [shameful practices][1]to MySQL, and someone pointed out that it’s probably only worthwhile to do so for apps likely to be installedon end-user machines. Adware in server software is not going to pay off. I saw [at least one project][2] which retained control over its SF account but rather than deleting it just turned off allread access. Might be a possibility. [1]: http://www.zdnet.com/article/oracle-extends-its-adware-bundling-to-include-java-for-macs/ [2]: https://twitter.com/OOLua/status/603908660264316928 -- Jason Petersen Software Engineer | Citus Data 303.736.9255 jason@citusdata.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: