RE: Does Oracle store values in indices?
От | Mikheev, Vadim |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Does Oracle store values in indices? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D32B1@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Does Oracle store values in indices? (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does Oracle store values in indices?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > But how Oracle handles this? > > > > Oracle doesn't have non-overwriting storage manager but uses > > rollback segments to maintain MVCC. Rollback segments are used > > to restore valid version of entire index/table page. > > Are there any plans to have something like this? I mean > overwriting storage manager. Well, I have plans to reimplement storage manager to allow space re-use without vacuum but without switching to overwriting, at least in near future - achievements/drawbacks are still questionable. We could add transaction data to index tuples but this would increase their size by ~ 16bytes. To estimate how this would affect performance for mostly statical tables one can run tests with schema below: create table i1 (i int, k int, l char(16)); create index i_i1 on i1 (i); create table i2 (i int, k int, l char(16)); create index i_i2 on i2 (i, k, l); Now fill tables with same data and run queries using only "I" in where clause. Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: