RE: Re: Loading optimization
От | Mikheev, Vadim |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Re: Loading optimization |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3263@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Loading optimization (Gary Wesley <gary@db.stanford.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Loading optimization
Re: Re: Loading optimization |
Список | pgsql-general |
> We have talked about this, but we have not seen enought > corruption cases to warrant it. Huh?! Just pg_ctl -m immediate stop in <= 7.0.X with high insert activity and ... pray. It's changed in 7.1 by WAL - btree doesn't lose tuples in split ops anymore and in after crash restart you'll never see btree tuples pointing to unexisted heap tuples (because of index tuples inserted/logged after heap ones). Nevertheless, WAL doesn't guarantee logical consistency of index in the case of aborted split ops (there may be pages unreferenced from parent level) - selects will work but inserts may result in "my bits moved off..." error. I'll try to fix this in 7.1 if I'll get some time (it doesn't look too hard to do). Also, WAL doesn't prevent zero blocks in files after crash - I didn't want to fsync log on each new block allocation, - but this shouldn't be a problem (except of lost disk space), afair scans are smart to handle it, Tom? I'm going to fix this with new smgr. Vadim
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: