RE: beta testing version

> > I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of 
> > ERserver is related to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server?
> > Let me clear things:
> >
> > 1. ERserver isn't based on WAL. It will work with any version >= 6.5
> >
> > 2. WAL was partially sponsored by my employer, Sectorbase.com,
> > not by PG, Inc.
> 
> Has somebody thought about putting PG in the GPL licence 
> instead of the BSD? 
> PG inc would still be able to do there money giving support 
> (just like IBM, HP and Compaq are doing there share with Linux),
> without been able to close the code.

ERserver is *external* application that change *nothing* in
PostgreSQL code. So, no matter under what licence are
server code, any company will be able to close code of
any privately developed *external* application.
And I don't see what's wrong with this, do you?

Vadim