Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F03582A-5BA3-495E-9268-06EC78D1739F@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 18 May 2016, at 05:35, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote: > Following up... > > It appears from today's PgCon meeting that the majority of core developers agree with my simplified proposal, just havingMAJOR.PATCH version numbers, and that the plan is to implement that, pending packager/etc feedback. > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2016_Developer_Meeting#Poll_on_Version_Numbering Looking at the entry there in the wiki, it says: "Simon called for a vote on whether the next release will be 10.0. There was already consensus that the next release is 10.0." For clarity, does that mean this release coming soon is 10.0, or the release after that - sometime in 2017(?) - is 10.0? :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: