Re: Postgres 11 release notes
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8E8CF1F8-BCB2-4D86-A059-4BF5138F6D87@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres 11 release notes (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 11 release notes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 19 Jun 2018, at 12:40, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:15 PM Alexander Korotkov > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 3:57 PM Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski >> <me@komzpa.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm not sure it is usefull in release notes since it is more about API, and not >>>>> user-facing change. Just in case. >>>>> GiST opclasses now can omit compress and decompress functions. If compress >>>>> function is omited, IndexOnlyScan is enabled for opclass without any extra >>>>> change. >>>>> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/ >>>>> d3a4f89d8a3e500bd7c0b7a8a8a5ce1b47859128 >>>> >>>> Uh, we do have this for SP-GiST: >>>> >>>> Allow SP-GiST indexes to optionally use compression (Teodor Sigaev, >>>> Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov) >>>> >>>> I am unclear how far downt the API stack I should go in documenting >>>> changes like this. >>> >>> >>> It is also a bit misleading - the idea in that change is that now index representation can be a lossy version of actualdata type (a box instead of polygon as a referende, so a changelog entry can tell "Allow SP-GiST index creation forpolygon datatype."). There is no "decompression" for such thing. "compression" sounds like gzip for me in user-facingcontext. >> >> +1 that current wording looks confusing. But I think we need to >> highlight that we have general SP-GiST improvement, not just support >> for particular datatype. So, I propose following wording: "Allow >> SP-GiST to use lossy representation of leaf keys, and add SP-GiST >> support for polygon type using that". > > Oh, I missed that we have separate release notes entry for polygons > indexing. Then second part of sentence isn't needed, it should be > just "Allow SP-GiST to use lossy representation of leaf keys". If no > objections, I'm going to commit that altogether with fixes by > Liudmila. Speaking of typos, I think I spotted two more: s/features is/feature is/. Fixed in the attached diff. cheers ./daniel
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: