Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8E6576C7-9CC1-47AB-BE4D-F545345029AB@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On January 6, 2020 10:44:12 PM PST, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: >On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:26:54PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2020-01-06 21:12:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> WFM. There are probably more elegant ways to do it than to drop >this >>> stuff into TopMemoryContext, but this is surely better than >unchecked >>> malloc calls. >> >> Yea, it's certainly better than the current situation. An incremental >> improvement would be to do the allocations in a separate contect, for >easier >> debugging should there ever be a leak... > >Sure. I am not sure if that's worth the extra work though, so I would >just be tempted to commit the patch that moves the allocation to >TopMemoryContext and call it a day. Any objections to that? Not from here -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: