Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8D08CBBA-9297-4E6D-9966-BF1718EB1D22@mit.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments (Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
Everyone is most definitely encouraged to just pick up a patch. In the past we've found people are often reluctant to do so especially for patche that seem to require specialized background. The rrreviewers are there to give people that extra encouragement. -- Greg On 2009-07-17, at 5:02 AM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:44:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:42:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jaime >>>> Casanova<jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: >>>>> should i wait until it gets committed or will you assign me some >>>>> other patch? >>>> >>>> How about this one next? >>>> >>>> Make pg_restore --clean to delete existing large objects >>> >>> Can I have one, too? My patch submitter just concluded his patch >>> needs >>> reworking. >> >> Sure, how 'bout DefaultACLs? > > For future reference, would it be easier if a rrreviewer-in-need-of- > work just > picked a patch, or would you like to be the Gatekeeper? (Insert > reference to > The Keymaster here...) > > -- > Joshua Tolley / eggyknap > End Point Corporation > http://www.endpoint.com
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: