Re: Not Picking Index
| От | George Pavlov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Not Picking Index |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8C5B026B51B6854CBE88121DBF097A8684DA43@ehost010-33.exch010.intermedia.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Not Picking Index (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Not Picking Index
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> Note the DROP INDEX will acquire exclusive lock on the table, so this > might not be the greatest thing to do in a production environment. > In PG 8.2 and up there is a sneakier way to do it that won't acquire > any more lock than the statement-under-test does: > > begin; > update pg_index set indisvalid = false > where indexrelid = 'soandso'::regclass; > explain analyze ...; > rollback; this really smacks of that four-letter word that starts with h... -- i am glad we have finally come around on the subject :-) seriously, this is a great technique and an enormous time saver during query optimization. thanks for sharing! george
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: