Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t)
От | George Pavlov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8C5B026B51B6854CBE88121DBF097A860346491A@ehost010-33.exch010.intermedia.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_restore question (-T and -t) (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Why not just try it! Answer: all -t switches after the first one are ignored. (And, no, "pg_restore --help" does not mention that). However with -l and -L, you have a much more powerful mechanism for specifying exactly which objects you want restored. > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general- > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto > Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 1:50 PM > To: pgsql general > Subject: [GENERAL] pg_restore question (-T and -t) > > Hi, > does anyone know if you can do multiple > -T or -t (restore named trigger, restore name table) switches? > > In the docs for pg_restore it does not specify if it will accept more > than one, but in the pg_dump docs the -n and -t switches allow > multiples. > > Thanks, > > tony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: