Re: stats_block_level
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: stats_block_level |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8B66357B-A288-40CE-9717-AFA35B92C161@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: stats_block_level (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: stats_block_level
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 26, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > So maybe the *real* question to ask is why we have separate GUCs for > stats_row_level and stats_block_level. Shouldn't we fold them into a > single switch? It's hard to see what having just one of them > turned on > will save. IIRC, the guys at Emma have seen a performance difference with stats_block_level off and row_level on, presumable due in part to having 150k tables. Erik? Kim? -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: