Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
От | Jeff |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8A2529C5-4CF1-11D8-B47D-000393D1F76E@torgo.978.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? (Cott Lang <cott@internetstaff.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Cott Lang wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 07:38, lnd@hnit.is wrote: > >> Meaning incremental (hot)-backups? >> Or as protection against DROP/TRUNCATE/DELETE ALL >> TABLE/SCHEMA/DATABASE? >> >> With a WAL it should be doable in some 7.x version, all ingredients >> are >> there. >> >> Possibly someone suceeded in doing it already? Having a baseline >> backup and >> saved WAL logs, shouldn't it be possible to recover? > > Incremental pg_dumps would be a huge step in the right direction! > > However, unless I am mistaken, a baseline backup would need to be taken > cold because you cannot take a consistent online backup of the data > files without using file system snapshots or split mirrors, and even > that's questionable. > pg_dump always takes a consistent dump - things won't change underneath it. So you're backup won't have anything that changed after pg_dump started.. thus where incremental would come in. -- Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: