Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8991.1511639441@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
I wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> writes: >> BTW I also see these failures in hstore: >> ==15168== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0x5d0fed0, 0x5d0fed0, 40) >> ==15168== at 0x4C2E00C: memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14 (vg_replace_strmem.c:1018) >> ==15168== by 0x15419A06: hstoreUniquePairs (hstore_io.c:343) >> ==15168== by 0x15419EE4: hstore_in (hstore_io.c:416) > Huh ... I tried to duplicate this on my RHEL6 workstation, and failed to, even though adding an assertion easily proves that the hstore regression test does exercise the case. So apparently the answer as to why skink isn't reporting this is just "not all versions of valgrind check it". I checked the git history and noted that we've previously fixed other nominally-undefined usage of memcpy() on the grounds that OpenBSD's libc will complain about it. So it seems like something that would be good to fix, and I did so. Meanwhile, skink has come back with a success as of 0f2458f, rendering the other mystery even deeper --- although at least this confirms the idea that the crashes we are seeing predate the generation.c patch. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: