Re[2]: [GENERAL] Joins and links

Hello David,

Monday, July 05, 1999 you wrote:

D> I have just been thinking a bit more and have realised that the
D> multi-generational architecture of 6.5 (which I have used in Interbase)
D> means that probably both clustering (in thr dynamic sense) and full
D> record number support as request by Leon are impractical.

D> It seems to me that record number relationships will fail completely if
D> there can be more than one version of a record.

Maybe it is a silly question, but what are "more than one version
of a record"? In my opinion record is a atomic unique entity.
Isn't it?

D> (well even if they are
D> forced to work they will lose some/all of their speed advantage).


Best regards, Leon