Re: Logical Replication WIP
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 895b30a5-59c5-2f32-ea06-34bfd6d1452c@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication WIP (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical Replication WIP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/08/16 10:13, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 9 August 2016 at 15:59, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com > <mailto:sawada.mshk@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > The logical replication launcher process and the apply process are > implemented as a bgworker. Isn't better to have them as an auxiliary > process like checkpointer, wal writer? > > > I don't think so. The checkpointer, walwriter, autovacuum, etc predate > bgworkers. I strongly suspect that if they were to be implemented now > they'd use bgworkers. > > Now, perhaps we want a new bgworker "kind" for system workers or some > other minor tweaks. But basically I think bgworkers are exactly what we > should be using here. > Agreed. > > IMO the number of logical replication connections should not be > limited by max_worker_processes. > > > Well, they *are* worker processes... but I take your point, that that > setting has been "number of bgworkers the user can run" and it might not > be expected that logical replication would use the same space. Again agree, I think we should ultimately go towards what PeterE suggested in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a2fffd92-6e59-a4eb-dd85-c5865ebca1a0@2ndquadrant.com > > The only argument I can see for not using bgworkers is for the > supervisor worker. It's a singleton that launches the per-database > workers, and arguably is a job that the postmaster could do better. The > current design there stems from its origins as an extension. Maybe > worker management could be simplified a bit as a result. I'd really > rather not invent yet another new and mostly duplicate category of > custom workers to achieve that though. > It is simplified compared to pglogical (there is only 2 worker types not 3). I don't think it's job of postmaster to scan catalogs however so it can't really start workers for logical replication. I actually modeled it more after autovacuum (using bgworkers though) than the original extension. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: